11.01.08 nightclass archetypes
I’m taking a night class in graphic design - I have a lot of ideas for web-based side projects, and taking the class is cheaper than hiring a designer. Plus, there’s a weird, alchemical quality to the skill of graphic designers, which I see as an “art with rules” that I’ve always been curious about.
I worried that a night class would cater mostly to housewives looking to “have evening activities”, but I’ve been pleasantly surprised. The teacher, a self-described old-school old fart, seems to be aiming to train professional designers. This is not my goal, but it’s definitely going to be an honest class.
Nevertheless, in every course one seems to meet the same archetypes of obnoxious classmates: the Oversharer, who feels the need to provide long personal stories illustrating each element of the lesson. These seem particularly common in management classes, and thankfully graphic design doesn’t lend itself well to this. However, no night class I’ve ever taken has ever been without a Commentator, the one sitting in front making unfunny jokes on everything the teacher says, thinking it’s banter, but really just delaying the proceedings needlessly. Who are those people?

MOI, je fais beaucoup de lectures et j’ai parcouru les textes de Heillenberg, notamment sa théorie sur la composition parallèle. Est-ce que ça s’applique dans ce cas-ci?
Prof: Oui.
Je viens de retourner à l’école et c’est ce avec quoi j’ai le plus de difficulté en ce moment.
“art with rulesâ€
=
functional creativity to me
in a sense this is not new.. Imagine! JS-Bach had to write stuff for church choirs with VERY strict rules.
Comment on this post
Copyright 2008 www.lightspeedchick.com